<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two&#8217;s Company : TDSAT’s Dual Spectrum Judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iltb.apargupta.com/2009/04/twos-company-tdsat%e2%80%99s-dual-spectrum-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iltb.apargupta.com/2009/04/twos-company-tdsat%e2%80%99s-dual-spectrum-judgment/</link>
	<description>Inter alia a blog on Electronic Commerce, Media AND Telecom Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:47:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delayed Further!!!!!! &#124; ILTB</title>
		<link>http://iltb.apargupta.com/2009/04/twos-company-tdsat%e2%80%99s-dual-spectrum-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Delayed Further!!!!!! &#124; ILTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iltb.apargupta.com/?p=84#comment-361</guid>
		<description>[...] TDSAT judgment in this case has not been endorsed by the large section of media, stakeholders and practitioners as it further demarcated the divisions between CDMA and GSM technologies and the facilities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TDSAT judgment in this case has not been endorsed by the large section of media, stakeholders and practitioners as it further demarcated the divisions between CDMA and GSM technologies and the facilities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
